DISSECTING ROBERT GLEAVE'S ORIENTALIST UNDERSTANDING

Abstract

This article examines the thoughts and approaches of Robert Gleave in the study of Islamic law,
focusing on criticizing his methodology and epistemology. As an orientalist, Gleave adopts a philological and
historical approach in researching Islamic law, especially in the Shia tradition. This approach has been
criticized by various Muslim scholars for ignoring the normative and transcendental aspects of Islamic law.
Moreover, Gleave's skepticism towards classical sources of Islamic law raises questions regarding the validity of
his approach in understanding Islamic law as a revelation-based system. The paper also discusses Gleave's bias
in interpreting Islamic hermeneutics as well as the limitations of his analysis in applying Islamic law in the
context of contemporary Muslim life. Using the perspective of Islamic epistemology, this paper concludes that
Gleave's approach needs to be examined more critically so that it is not only Western academically oriented but
also respects the principles of Islamic law held by Muslims.